This year brings an unreasonable number of classic horror anniversaries: Scream turns thirty, Hammer's run of gothic horror turns sixty, and the body horror films of 1986 turn forty. I've been treating my sofa like a small, dimly lit shrine to all three, working through the birthdays one dark evening at a time.
Which classic horror films are turning 30, 40 and 60 this year?
Start with the one everyone actually remembers watching for the first time. Scream turns thirty this year, which feels impossible until you remember it came out when landlines still had cords. It didn't just scare people, it told them off for being scared, listed the rules out loud, then broke every one of them anyway. If you've never sat down with the whole run in one go, the Scream Blu-ray box set is the version I'd actually reach for. It holds up in a way a lot of self aware horror still doesn't manage.
Further back, Hammer's run of gothic horror turns sixty this year, all fog machines and capes and Christopher Lee refusing to blink. It's cheap looking by today's standards and somehow that's the whole charm. Nobody was trying to trick you with CGI, they just leaned very hard into a candle and a good cape. And 1986 gets its fortieth, the year body horror properly arrived and started asking questions I'd rather it hadn't. None of it dates the way you'd expect. If anything the practical effects have aged better than most of what came after them.
Advertisement
Which horror film started it all?
Then there's Nosferatu, which isn't marking a tidy round number this year but deserves a mention regardless, because it is well over a century old and it is still the film every vampire story is quietly copying. That shadow climbing the staircase wall did more work than most modern jump scares manage with a full sound department behind them. I keep a restored copy for exactly this kind of evening, and the Nosferatu 1922 restored Blu-ray print is the clearest version I've found, which matters more than you'd think when half the film is happening in shadow on purpose.
What gets me about it isn't the vampire. It's that a film with no dialogue, made when cinema itself was barely out of nappies, still manages to be unsettling on a Tuesday night with the heating on and a mug of tea going cold beside me. That's not nostalgia. That's just good filmmaking refusing to expire.
Little disasters guaranteed
I will say, marking anniversaries properly has its own hazards. I tried to do a proper double bill last weekend, Scream first, then something older for contrast, and fell asleep face down on the sofa somewhere around the second act with the popcorn bowl still balanced on my chest. Woke up an hour later, freezing, film long finished, popcorn everywhere except in my mouth. This is apparently what marking history looks like when you do it alone on a Friday.
If you're planning something similar, do it properly. Blanket within reach, something warm in a mug, and accept in advance that the second film might just become background noise for a nap. That's not a failure of the film. It's a failure of scheduling a nine o'clock start after a full day of pretending to be a functioning adult.
How I'm marking it this year
I'm not much for grand gestures, but a proper watch through of the films actually having a birthday feels like the right kind of quiet celebration. No cake, obviously, though I wouldn't say no. Just the lights down, something classic on, and the small satisfaction of knowing exactly why a film that's thirty, forty or sixty years old still gets under your skin the same as it always did.
Go on then. Which one's getting your evening this week, the newer birthday film or the properly old one? I promise not to judge you either way, though I reserve the right to be smug if you pick Nosferatu.
Ad · Includes affiliate links; we may earn a commission.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. How the links work.